Implementing personalized pathways for cancer follow-up care in the United States: Proceedings from an American Cancer Society–American Society of Clinical Oncology summit Review


Authors: Alfano, C. M.; Mayer, D. K.; Bhatia, S.; Maher, J.; Scott, J. M.; Nekhlyudov, L.; Merrill, J. K.; Henderson, T. O.
Review Title: Implementing personalized pathways for cancer follow-up care in the United States: Proceedings from an American Cancer Society–American Society of Clinical Oncology summit
Abstract: A new approach to cancer follow-up care is necessary to meet the needs of cancer survivors while dealing with increasing volume and provider shortages, knowledge gaps, and costs to both health care systems and patients. An approach that triages patients to personalized follow-up care pathways, depending on the type(s) and level(s) of resources needed for patients’ long-term care, is in use in the United Kingdom and other countries and has been shown to meet patients’ needs, more efficiently use the health care system, and reduce costs. Recognizing that testing and implementing a similar personalized approach to cancer follow-up care in the United States will require a multipronged strategy, the American Cancer Society and the American Society of Clinical Oncology convened a summit in January 2018 to identify the needed steps to move this work from concept to implementation. The summit identified 4 key strategies going forward: 1) developing a candidate model (or models) of care delivery; 2) building the case for implementation by conducting studies modeling the effects of personalized pathways of follow-up care on patient outcomes, workforce and health care resources, and utilization and costs; 3) creating consensus-based guidelines to guide the delivery of personalized care pathways; and 4) identifying and filling research gaps to develop and implement needed care changes. While these national strategies are pursued, oncology and primary care providers can lay the groundwork for implementation by assessing their patients’ risk of recurrence and the chronic and late effects of cancer as well as other health care needs and resources available for care and by considering triaging patients accordingly, referring patients to appropriate specialized survivorship clinics as these are developed, helping to support patients who are capable of self-managing their health, setting expectations with patients from diagnosis onward for the need for follow-up in primary care and/or a survivorship clinic, and improving coordination of care between oncology and primary care. © 2019 American Cancer Society
Keywords: united states; cancer patient; outcome assessment; follow up; consensus; evidence-based practice; risk assessment; health care cost; health care utilization; survivorship; disease management; health care delivery; health care planning; policy; england; cancer survivors; human; priority journal; article; malignant neoplasm; northern ireland
Journal Title: CA - A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
Volume: 69
Issue: 3
ISSN: 0007-9235
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell  
Date Published: 2019-05-01
Start Page: 234
End Page: 247
Language: English
DOI: 10.3322/caac.21558
PUBMED: 30849190
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC7376887
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Jessica M Scott
    71 Scott