Immunohistochemistry as first-line screening for detecting colorectal cancer patients at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: A 2-antibody panel may be as predictive as a 4-antibody panel Journal Article


Authors: Shia, J.; Tang, L. H.; Vakiani, E.; Guillem, J. G.; Stadler, Z. K.; Soslow, R. A.; Katabi, N.; Weiser, M. R.; Paty, P. B.; Temple, L. K.; Nash, G. M.; Wong, W. D.; Offit, K.; Klimstra, D. S.
Article Title: Immunohistochemistry as first-line screening for detecting colorectal cancer patients at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: A 2-antibody panel may be as predictive as a 4-antibody panel
Abstract: The utility of immunohistochemical detection of DNA mismatch repair proteins in screening colorectal cancer for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is being widely investigated. Currently, in both research and clinical settings, a 4-antibody panel that includes the 4 most commonly affected proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) is being used generally. On the basis of the biochemical properties of these proteins, we hypothesized that a 2-antibody panel, comprising MSH6 and PMS2, would be sufficient to detect abnormalities in all 4 proteins. We tested this hypothesis on a series of 232 colorectal carcinoma samples derived from 2 patient cohorts: (1) a prospectively accrued series of patients who were judged to carry a higher-than-average risk for HNPCC based on the revised Bethesda guidelines (n=190); and (2) a retrospective series of patients who were 40 years of age or younger (n=42). Immunohistochemical stains were regarded as negative (protein lost), when there was no nuclear labeling in tumor cells (with positive internal control). Overall, 70 of the 232 tumors demonstrated loss of at least one protein. The most common abnormality was concurrent loss of MLH1 and PMS2 (observed in 17% of the cases), followed by concurrent loss of MSH2 and MSH6 (6%). All MLH1 and MSH2-abnormal cases were also abnormal for PMS2 and MSH6, respectively, whereas 9 of 50 (18%) PMS2 and 6 of 20 (30%) MSH6-abnormal cases showed only isolated loss of PMS2 or MSH6 (with normal staining for MLH1 and MSH2). As such, our findings provide evidence that a 2-antibody panel (PMS2 and MSH6) is as effective as the current 4-antibody panel in detecting DNA mismatch repair protein abnormalities. Such a cost-effective approach carries significant implication, as immunohistochemistry is being widely used as first-line screening for HNPCC. Copyright © 2009 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Keywords: immunohistochemistry; adult; controlled study; human tissue; middle aged; retrospective studies; human cell; major clinical study; mutation; dna-binding proteins; cancer risk; cancer patient; prospective studies; colorectal cancer; adenocarcinoma; dna repair; protein depletion; neoplasm proteins; tumor markers, biological; cancer screening; mass screening; retrospective study; nuclear proteins; cost effectiveness analysis; immunoenzyme techniques; mismatch repair; microsatellite instability; dna mismatch repair; tumor cell; predictive value of tests; adaptor proteins, signal transducing; dna repair enzymes; protein mlh1; hnpcc; lynch syndrome; protein msh2; protein msh6; colorectal neoplasms, hereditary nonpolyposis; adenosine triphosphatases; muts homolog 2 protein; mismatch repair protein pms2; msi
Journal Title: American Journal of Surgical Pathology
Volume: 33
Issue: 11
ISSN: 0147-5185
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 2009-11-01
Start Page: 1639
End Page: 1645
Language: English
DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181b15aa2
PUBMED: 19701074
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Cited By (since 1996): 6" - "Export Date: 30 November 2010" - "CODEN: AJSPD" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Kenneth Offit
    788 Offit
  2. Philip B Paty
    499 Paty
  3. Jose Guillem
    414 Guillem
  4. Zsofia Kinga Stadler
    391 Stadler
  5. Nora Katabi
    304 Katabi
  6. David S Klimstra
    978 Klimstra
  7. Jinru Shia
    720 Shia
  8. Martin R Weiser
    538 Weiser
  9. Robert Soslow
    793 Soslow
  10. Laura Hong Tang
    447 Tang
  11. Garrett Nash
    263 Nash
  12. Larissa Temple
    193 Temple
  13. Efsevia Vakiani
    264 Vakiani
  14. Douglas W Wong
    178 Wong