Development of Clinical Domain Working Groups for the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen): Lessons learned and plans for the future Review


Authors: Milko, L. V.; Funke, B. H.; Hershberger, R. E.; Azzariti, D. R.; Lee, K.; Riggs, E. R.; Rivera-Munoz, E. A.; Weaver, M. A.; Niehaus, A.; Currey, E. L.; Craigen, W. J.; Mao, R.; Offit, K.; Steiner, R. D.; Martin, C. L.; Rehm, H. L.; Watson, M. S.; Ramos, E. M.; Plon, S. E.; Berg, J. S.
Review Title: Development of Clinical Domain Working Groups for the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen): Lessons learned and plans for the future
Abstract: The Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) is supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to develop expertly curated and freely accessible resources defining the clinical relevance of genes and variants for use in precision medicine and research. To facilitate expert input, ClinGen has formed Clinical Domain Working Groups (CDWGs) to leverage the collective knowledge of clinicians, laboratory diagnosticians, and researchers. In the initial phase of ClinGen, CDWGs were launched in the cardiovascular, hereditary cancer, and inborn errors of metabolism clinical fields. These early CDWGs established the infrastructure necessary to implement standardized processes developed or adopted by ClinGen working groups for the interpretation of gene–disease associations and variant pathogenicity, and provided a sustainable model for the formation of future disease-focused curation groups. The establishment of CDWGs requires recruitment of international experts to broadly represent the interests of their field and ensure that assertions made are reliable and widely accepted. Building on the successes, challenges, and trade-offs made in establishing the original CDWGs, ClinGen has developed standard operating procedures for the development of CDWGs in new clinical domains, while maximizing efforts to scale up curation and facilitate involvement of external groups who wish to utilize ClinGen methods and infrastructure for expert curation. © 2018, American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Keywords: validation process; genetic variability; validation study; information storage; genome analysis; medical research; reliability; genetic disorder; predictive value; personalized medicine; genetic database; process development; genomic medicine; human; article; clinical data repository; clingen; expert curation; clinical genome resource
Journal Title: Genetics in Medicine
Volume: 21
Issue: 4
ISSN: 1098-3600
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group  
Date Published: 2019-04-01
Start Page: 987
End Page: 993
Language: English
DOI: 10.1038/s41436-018-0267-2
PUBMED: 30181607
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC6401338
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 May 2019 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Kenneth Offit
    788 Offit