Variation in the thoroughness of pathologic assessment and response rates of locally advanced rectal cancers after chemoradiation Journal Article


Authors: Chow, O. S.; Patil, S.; Keskin, M.; Smith, J. J.; Widmar, M.; Smith, D. D.; Avila, K.; Shia, J.; Chu, P.; Garcia-Aguilar, J.
Article Title: Variation in the thoroughness of pathologic assessment and response rates of locally advanced rectal cancers after chemoradiation
Abstract: Background: Pathologic complete response (pCR) is associated with better prognosis and guides management for patients with advanced rectal cancer. Response rates vary between series for unclear reasons. We examine whether the thoroughness of pathologic assessment explains differences in pCR rates. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed pathology reports from patients with stage II/III rectal cancer who underwent chemoradiation and resection in a prospective, multicenter trial. We utilized a novel measure for the thoroughness of pathologic assessment by dividing residual tumor size by the number of cassettes evaluated (tumor size to cassette ratio, TSCR), and evaluated whether TSCR is associated with pCR. We validated our findings using a separate cohort. Results: From the trial cohort, 71 of 247 (29%) patients achieved pCR. The pCR rate ranged from 0 to 45% and mean TSCR ranged 0.29 to 0.87 across 12 institutions. Within each institution, a lower TSCR was associated with pCR, demonstrating a higher degree of thoroughness used for tumors that achieved pCR. Moreover, across all samples, low TSCR was independently associated with pCR on multivariable analysis. This finding was corroborated in a separate cohort of 201 tumors evaluated by five pathologists; each pathologist had a lower mean TSCR for pCR calls compared with non-pCR calls. However, the mean TSCR for an institution was not associated with its overall pCR rate. Conclusions: Pathologists assess rectal cancers that have responded significantly to neoadjuvant therapy more thoroughly. Thoroughness does not appear to explain differences in pCR rates between institutions. Our results suggest pCR is not a sampling artifact. © 2019, The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.
Keywords: recist; surgical pathology; chemoradiotherapy; rectal cancer; residual tumor
Journal Title: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Volume: 23
Issue: 4
ISSN: 1091-255X
Publisher: Springer  
Date Published: 2019-04-01
Start Page: 794
End Page: 799
Language: English
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04119-x
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC6430657
PUBMED: 30719677
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 April 2019 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Sujata Patil
    511 Patil
  2. Jinru Shia
    715 Shia
  3. Karin Avila
    11 Avila
  4. Jesse Joshua Smith
    217 Smith
  5. Maria   Widmar
    74 Widmar
  6. Metin   Keskin
    10 Keskin