Randomized trial of hepatic arterial floxuridine, mitomycin, and carmustine versus floxuridine alone in previously treated patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer Journal Article


Authors: Kemeny, N.; Cohen, A.; Seiter, K.; Conti, J. A.; Sigurdson, E. R.; Tao, Y.; Niedzwiecki, D.; Botet, J.; Budd, A.
Article Title: Randomized trial of hepatic arterial floxuridine, mitomycin, and carmustine versus floxuridine alone in previously treated patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer
Abstract: Purpose: This study was designed to determine if hepatic arterial therapy with floxuridine (F), mitomycin, and carmustine (BCNU) (FMB) is superior to hepatic arterial therapy with F alone in previously treated patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. Patients and Methods: Ninety-five patients were randomized to intrahepatic FMB versus intrahepatic F. All patients had tumor progression after systemic chemotherapy (either therapeutic or adjuvant). Results: There was no significant difference in response rate (47% FMB v 33% F; P = .17). Median survival was similar in the two groups, 19.1 months for the FMB group compared with 14.0 months for the F group (P = .23). The overall median survival was 16.8 months. In patients who received prior adjuvant therapy, there was no difference between the two groups, but response rate was high in both (50% FMB v 62% F). The response rate for all patients who had received only prior adjuvant therapy versus all those who had received prior therapy for metastatic disease was 57% and 35%, respectively (P = .066). In the subset of patients whose disease had progressed with prior systemic chemotherapy, the response rate to FMB was greater than that to F (47% v 23%; P = .035). Conclusion: The overall partial response rate of 39% and the overall survival of 16.8 months from initiation of intrahepatitis therapy show that hepatic arterial therapy is a reasonable treatment option for patients whose tumor does not respond to systemic therapy or whose disease progresses after adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer. © 1993 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Keywords: adult; cancer survival; treatment outcome; aged; aged, 80 and over; survival analysis; major clinical study; cancer combination chemotherapy; drug efficacy; liver neoplasms; adjuvant therapy; comparative study; colorectal cancer; phase 2 clinical trial; antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols; carmustine; colorectal neoplasms; liver metastasis; intraarterial drug administration; infusions, intra-arterial; mitomycin; floxuridine; hepatic artery; middle age; mitomycins; human; male; female; priority journal; article; support, u.s. gov't, p.h.s.
Journal Title: Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume: 11
Issue: 2
ISSN: 0732-183X
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology  
Date Published: 1993-02-01
Start Page: 330
End Page: 335
Language: English
DOI: 10.1200/jco.1993.11.2.330
PUBMED: 8426211
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 March 2019 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Alfred M Cohen
    244 Cohen
  2. Nancy Kemeny
    543 Kemeny
  3. Yue Tao
    20 Tao
  4. José F. Botet
    60 Botet
  5. John A. Conti
    23 Conti