Phase II trial of carboplatin and etoposide in metastatic breast cancer Journal Article


Authors: Crown, J.; Hakes, T.; Reichman, B.; Lebwohl, D.; Gilewski, T.; Surbone, A.; Currie, V.; Yao, T. J.; Hudis, C.; Seidman, A.; Norton, L.
Article Title: Phase II trial of carboplatin and etoposide in metastatic breast cancer
Abstract: Background. High‐dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic support produces high rates of response in metastatic breast cancer. To facilitate new high‐dose regimens there is a need to identify active agents with toxicity limited to hematopoietic suppression. Cisplatin/etoposide is a highly active regimen in metastatic breast cancer, but cisplatin dose‐escalation is limited by nonhematologic toxicity. Carboplatin is active in breast cancer and has marrow‐dominant toxicity. Demonstration of activity for the combination of carboplatin and etoposide would facilitate their inclusion in high‐dose programs. Methods. A single treatment arm prospective Phase II study in patients with measurable or evaluable breast cancer was done. Results. Forty‐six patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with the combination of carboplatin and etoposide. Among 19 patients without prior chemotherapy, one complete and seven partial responses were observed, for an objective response rate of 42% (95% exact confidence intervals [CI], 20–67%). One partial response was seen among 12 patients with prior chemotherapy limited to the adjuvant setting. No responses were seen among 14 patients who had received prior chemotherapy for metastatic cancer. Two treatment‐related deaths occurred, both attributable to sepsis. One patient returned to her community for treatment after receiving one course of protocol therapy before response assessment and could not be studied for response. Conclusion. The activity observed with this regimen in patients with no prior chemotherapy coupled with its potential for dose escalation suggests a possible role in high‐dose programs with hematopoietic support. The inactivity of the combination in patients with prior therapy for metastatic breast cancer indicates that there is no advantage to its use in the salvage setting. Copyright © 1993 American Cancer Society
Keywords: adult; clinical article; aged; bone neoplasms; survival rate; cancer combination chemotherapy; cancer adjuvant therapy; drug megadose; lymphatic metastasis; carboplatin; phase 2 clinical trial; breast cancer; etoposide; blood toxicity; antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols; lung neoplasms; breast neoplasms; liver; drug response; remission induction; hematopoiesis; metastatic breast cancer; intravenous drug administration; injections, intravenous; middle age; human; female; priority journal; article; support, non-u.s. gov't
Journal Title: Cancer
Volume: 71
Issue: 4
ISSN: 0008-543X
Publisher: Wiley Blackwell  
Date Published: 1993-02-15
Start Page: 1254
End Page: 1257
Language: English
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930215)71:4<1254::Aid-cncr2820710414>3.0.Co;2-x
PUBMED: 8435802
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Andrew D Seidman
    318 Seidman
  2. Clifford Hudis
    905 Hudis
  3. Larry Norton
    760 Norton
  4. Tzy-Jyun Yao
    59 Yao
  5. Violante Currie
    51 Currie
  6. Thomas B Hakes
    115 Hakes
  7. Antonella   Surbone
    33 Surbone
  8. David Lebwohl
    28 Lebwohl
  9. John Crown
    47 Crown