Refining esophageal cancer staging after neoadjuvant therapy: Importance of treatment response Journal Article


Authors: Barbour, A. P.; Jones, M.; Gonen, M.; Gotley, D. C.; Thomas, J.; Thomson, D. B.; Burmeister, B.; Smithers, B. M.
Article Title: Refining esophageal cancer staging after neoadjuvant therapy: Importance of treatment response
Abstract: Objective: Accurate staging is vital for esophageal cancer management. The utility of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system 6th edition for esophageal cancer has been questioned for resected patients who receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). This study was undertaken to assess the AJCC staging system for patients with esophageal cancer that have received neoadjuvant CRT and to identify clinicopathological variables that predict survival. Methods: Review of a prospective esophageal cancer database was undertaken for patients that received neoadjuvant CRT and resection. Primary tumor response was defined as major (≤10% residual tumor cells) or minor (>10% residual tumor cells). Cox regression and concordance analyses were used to determine prognostic factors. Median follow-up was 61 months. Results: Of 131 patients with invasive cancer, there were 40/131 (31%) with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and 88/131 (65%) with adenocarcinoma. The procedure-related mortality rate was 3.8%. Median survival was 33 months. A major response was demonstrated by 79/131 (60%) patients. Survival analyses found that the AJCC 6th edition was unable to discriminate between stages 0, I, and IIa or stages IIb and III. Multivariate survival analyses found age, pretreatment tumor length >6 cm, positive lymph nodes, and a major tumor response were independent prognostic factors. These data were used to derive a new staging system that had improved discrimination of stage groups over the current AJCC system. Conclusion: The current AJCC staging system for esophageal cancer is inadequate for patients that receive neoadjuvant CRT. Refinement of the AJCC staging system should include primary tumor response for patients receiving neoadjuvant CRT. © 2008 Society of Surgical Oncology.
Keywords: adult; cancer survival; human tissue; treatment outcome; treatment response; aged; middle aged; cancer surgery; survival rate; major clinical study; histopathology; carcinoma, squamous cell; cisplatin; fluorouracil; cancer combination chemotherapy; multimodality cancer therapy; cancer adjuvant therapy; cancer radiotherapy; chemotherapy, adjuvant; combined modality therapy; neoadjuvant therapy; radiotherapy, adjuvant; cancer staging; follow up; staging; lymphatic metastasis; neoplasm staging; prospective studies; adenocarcinoma; tumor localization; multiple cycle treatment; antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols; continuous infusion; cancer mortality; disease severity; minimal residual disease; prognostic factors; neoplasm invasiveness; esophageal adenocarcinoma; esophageal neoplasms; esophagectomy; chemoradiotherapy; esophageal cancer; esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; esophagogastric junction
Journal Title: Annals of Surgical Oncology
Volume: 15
Issue: 10
ISSN: 1068-9265
Publisher: Springer  
Date Published: 2008-01-01
Start Page: 2894
End Page: 2902
Language: English
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-008-0084-y
PUBMED: 18663531
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Cited By (since 1996): 11" - "Export Date: 17 November 2011" - "CODEN: ASONF" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Mithat Gonen
    1028 Gonen