American Society of Clinical Oncology endorsement of the cancer care Ontario practice guideline on adjuvant ovarian ablation in the treatment of premenopausal women with early-stage invasive breast cancer Journal Article


Authors: Griggs, J. J.; Somerfield, M. R.; Anderson, H.; Henry, N. L.; Hudis, C. A.; Khatcheressian, J. L.; Partridge, A. H.; Prestrud, A. A.; Davidson, N. E.
Article Title: American Society of Clinical Oncology endorsement of the cancer care Ontario practice guideline on adjuvant ovarian ablation in the treatment of premenopausal women with early-stage invasive breast cancer
Abstract: Purpose: The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has policies and procedures for endorsing practice guidelines that have been developed by other professional organizations. Methods: The Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) Guideline on Adjuvant Ovarian Ablation (OA) in the Treatment of Premenopausal Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer was reviewed for developmental rigor by methodologists. An ad hoc review panel of experts reviewed the content. Results: The ASCO ad hoc OA guideline review panel concurred that the recommendations are clear, thorough, based on the most relevant scientific evidence in this content area, and present options that will be acceptable to patients. According to the CCO guideline: one, OA should not be routinely added to systemic therapy with chemotherapy, tamoxifen, or the combination of tamoxifen and chemotherapy; two, OA alone is not recommended as an alternative to any other form of systemic therapy, except in the specific case of patients who are candidates for other forms of systemic therapy but who, for some reason, will not receive any other systemic therapy (eg, patients who cannot tolerate other forms of systemic therapy or patients who choose no other form of systemic therapy); and three, when chemical suppression using luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists is the chosen method of OA, in the opinion of the Breast Cancer Disease Site Group, monthly injection is the recommended mode of administration. The mode of administration in nearly all of the available trials has been monthly administration. Conclusion: The ASCO review panel agrees with the recommendations as stated in the CCO guideline, with the qualification that ongoing research studies may alter the recommendations of the panel. © 2011 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Keywords: doxorubicin; fluorouracil; systemic therapy; cancer radiotherapy; methotrexate; cancer staging; clinical practice; breast cancer; antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols; cyclophosphamide; practice guideline; breast neoplasms; exemestane; cancer invasion; health care policy; goserelin; ovary; cancer center; practice guidelines as topic; ablation techniques; neoplasm metastasis; medical society; tamoxifen; short survey; neoplasm invasiveness; premenopause; triptorelin; ablation therapy; non profit organization; ontario; luteinizing hormone release
Journal Title: Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume: 29
Issue: 29
ISSN: 0732-183X
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology  
Date Published: 2011-10-11
Start Page: 3939
End Page: 3942
Language: English
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.36.4950
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 21900112
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Export Date: 2 November 2011" - "CODEN: JCOND" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Clifford Hudis
    905 Hudis