Tumor vascularity is not a prognostic factor for malignant melanoma of the skin Journal Article


Authors: Busam, K. J.; Berwick, M.; Blessing, K.; Fandrey, K.; Kang, S.; Karaoli, T.; Fine, J.; Cochran, A. J.; White, W. L.; Rivers, J.; Elder, D. E.; Wen, D. R. P.; Heyman, B. H.; Barnhill, R. L.
Article Title: Tumor vascularity is not a prognostic factor for malignant melanoma of the skin
Abstract: Tumor vascularity has been proposed as a prognostic indicator for a number of solid tumors. Although a correlation between microvessel number and metastatic behavior has also been suggested for cutaneous melanoma, the small number of cases studied to date allows, one to draw only preliminary conclusions In this study, we have assessed tumor vascularity in cutaneous melanoma by comparing 60 cases of metastasizing and non-metastasizing tumors matched for tumor thickness, age, sex, and anatomic site. Ulex europaeus agglutinin I appeared to be the most suitable vascular marker for this study. Our results indicate that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with regard to tumor vascularity. Even after identifying 15 cases of thin (<1.0 mm thick) melanoma, there was no significant difference in the number of microvessels between metastatizing and non-metastasizing tumors. Comparison of patterns of vascular microarchitecture also failed to discriminate between the two groups. Thus, our results indicate that tumor vascularity may not be an independent prognostic factor for cutaneous melanoma.
Keywords: metastasis; angiogenesis; progression; lesions; breast-carcinoma; lectin; uveal melanoma; thickness; cancer; viii-related antigen
Journal Title: American Journal of Pathology
Volume: 147
Issue: 4
ISSN: 0002-9440
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 1995-10-01
Start Page: 1049
End Page: 1056
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:A1995RZ18200018
PROVIDER: wos
PMCID: PMC1871014
PUBMED: 7573350
Notes: Article -- Source: Wos
Citation Impact
MSK Authors
  1. Marianne Berwick
    120 Berwick