Personalized management of elderly patients with rectal cancer: Expert recommendations of the European Society of Surgical Oncology, European Society of Coloproctology, International Society of Geriatric Oncology, and American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer Journal Article


Authors: Montroni, I.; Ugolini, G.; Saur, N. M.; Spinelli, A.; Rostoft, S.; Millan, M.; Wolthuis, A.; Daniels, I. R.; Hompes, R.; Penna, M.; Fürst, A.; Papamichael, D.; Desai, A. M.; Cascinu, S.; Gèrard, J. P.; Myint, A. S.; Lemmens, V. E. P. P.; Berho, M.; Lawler, M.; De Liguori Carino, N.; Potenti, F.; Nanni, O.; Altini, M.; Beets, G.; Rutten, H.; Winchester, D.; Wexner, S. D.; Audisio, R. A.
Article Title: Personalized management of elderly patients with rectal cancer: Expert recommendations of the European Society of Surgical Oncology, European Society of Coloproctology, International Society of Geriatric Oncology, and American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer
Abstract: With an expanding elderly population and median rectal cancer detection age of 70 years, the prevalence of rectal cancer in elderly patients is increasing. Management is based on evidence from younger patients, resulting in substandard treatments and poor outcomes. Modern management of rectal cancer in the elderly demands patient-centered treatment, assessing frailty rather than chronological age. The heterogeneity of this group, combined with the limited available data, impedes drafting evidence-based guidelines. Therefore, a multidisciplinary task force convened experts from the European Society of Surgical Oncology, European Society of Coloproctology, International Society of Geriatric Oncology and the American College Surgeons Commission on Cancer, with the goal of identifying the best practice to promote personalized rectal cancer care in older patients. A crucial element for personalized care was recognized as the routine screening for frailty and geriatrician involvement and personalized care for frail patients. Careful patient selection and improved surgical and perioperative techniques are responsible for a substantial improvement in rectal cancer outcomes. Therefore, properly selected patients should be considered for surgical resection. Local excision can be utilized when balancing oncologic outcomes, frailty and life expectancy. Watch and wait protocols, in expert hands, are valuable for selected patients and adjuncts can be added to improve complete response rates. Functional recovery and patient-reported outcomes are as important as oncologic-specific outcomes in this age group. The above recommendations and others were made based on the best-available evidence to guide the personalized treatment of elderly patients with rectal cancer. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology
Keywords: aged; primary tumor; review; advanced cancer; cancer risk; antineoplastic agent; cancer palliative therapy; cancer therapy; health care cost; patient care; liver metastasis; minimally invasive surgery; cancer epidemiology; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; rectum cancer; recommendations; rectal cancer; personalized medicine; elective surgery; emergency treatment; patient-reported outcome; cancer rehabilitation; local excision; multidisciplinary; elderly patients; frailty; functional recovery; adjuvant chemoradiotherapy; human; priority journal
Journal Title: European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume: 44
Issue: 11
ISSN: 0748-7983
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2018-11-01
Start Page: 1685
End Page: 1702
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.08.003
PUBMED: 30150158
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Review -- Export Date: 1 November 2018 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Avni Mukund Desai
    20 Desai