The use of direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomies Meeting Abstract


Authors: Latkany, L. M.; Bloch, A. S.; Shike, M.; Gerdes, H.
Abstract Title: The use of direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomies
Meeting Title: 78th Annual Meeting of the American Dietetic Association
Abstract: Direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomies (DPEJ) were evaluated to determine feasibility of technique, nutrition related outcomes and length of tube use in a cancer population. DPEJ is a technique using a tube placed directly into a proximal jejunual loop, pulling anteriorly with the endoscope and discreetly transluminating the jejunum. Patients were followed for duration of tube use. Results for the period of 1991-1995 follow: In 127 patients, (103 inpatients, 24 outpatients), in whom the technique was attempted, DPEJ's were successfully placed in 122 (96%), while 5 (4%) could not be placed for technical reasons. Of the successful placements 115 were used for feeding and 7 for drainage. Indications for the procedure were: gastric outlet obstruction (37%), recurrent or potential aspiration (35%), anorexia (12%), small bowel obstruction (9%), gastroesophageal anastomotic leak (4%), and gastroparesis (3%). There were 4 severe complications (abdominal bleeding, abdominal abscess, jejunal perforation, and colonic perforation), but no deaths occurred as a result of the procedure. Eighty-two males and 45 females, with a mean age of 64 ± 12 years were given DPEJ's. At the time of procedure mean weight loss was 15% of usual body weight and mean po intake was approximately 370 Kcal. In the 92 patients for which follow-up data was available, the mean period of DPEJ utilization was 114 ± 169 days: reasons for ending tube utilization were death (78%) or adequate po intake (22%). Method of feeding delivery was predominantly by pump (97%), with (3%) using gravity. Mean formula caloric intake at follow-up was 89% of the caloric goal determined by 30-40 Kcal/kg of baseline weight. An increase of 2% mean body weight and 33% mean po intake occurred in this DPEJ population. These results suggest that DPEJ can be placed safely and may be a viable procedure for achieving nutritional goals in patients where jejunal feedings are indicated. © 1995 American Dietetic Association.
Journal Title: Journal of the American Dietetic Association
Volume: 95
Issue: 9 Suppl.
Meeting Dates: 1995 Oct 30-Nov 2
Meeting Location: Chicago, IL
ISSN: 0002-8223
Publisher: Amer Dietetic Assoc  
Date Published: 1995-09-01
Start Page: A87
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8223(95)00653-2
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 7642884
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 28 August 2018 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Moshe Shike
    168 Shike
  2. Hans Gerdes
    176 Gerdes
  3. Lianne M Russo
    23 Russo
  4. Abby S. Bloch
    26 Bloch