Enhancing decision making about participation in cancer clinical trials: Development of a question prompt list Journal Article


Authors: Brown, R. F.; Shuk, E.; Leighl, N.; Butow, P.; Ostroff, J.; Edgerson, S.; Tattersall, M.
Article Title: Enhancing decision making about participation in cancer clinical trials: Development of a question prompt list
Abstract: Purpose: Slow accrual to cancer clinical trials impedes the progress of effective new cancer treatments. Poor physician-patient communication has been identified as a key contributor to low trial accrual. Question prompt lists (QPLs) have demonstrated a significant promise in facilitating communication in general, surgical, and palliative oncology settings. These simple patient interventions have not been tested in the oncology clinical trial setting. We aimed to develop a targeted QPL for clinical trials (QPL-CT). Method: Lung, breast, and prostate cancer patients who either had (trial experienced) or had not (trial naive) participated in a clinical trial were invited to join focus groups to help develop and explore the acceptability of a QPL-CT. Focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed. A research team, including a qualitative data expert, analyzed these data to explore patients' decision-making processes and views about the utility of the QPL-CT prompt to aid in trial decision making. Results: Decision making was influenced by the outcome of patients' comparative assessment of perceived risks versus benefits of a trial, and the level of trust patients had in their doctors' recommendation about the trial. Severity of a patient's disease influenced trial decision making only for trial-naive patients. Conclusion: Although patients were likely to prefer a paternalistic decision-making style, they expressed valuation of the QPL as an aid to decision making. QPL-CT utility extended beyond the actual consultation to include roles both before and after the clinical trial discussion. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.
Keywords: adult; clinical article; controlled study; aged; risk benefit analysis; cancer patient; cancer staging; outcome assessment; tumor localization; breast cancer; lung cancer; information processing; urogenital tract cancer; risk factor; prostate cancer; questionnaire; intervention study; patient participation; disease severity; doctor patient relation; education; consultation; marriage; decision making; clinical trials; qualitative analysis; clinical trial (topic); trust; physician-patient communication; audio recording; question prompt lists; question prompt list
Journal Title: Supportive Care in Cancer
Volume: 19
Issue: 8
ISSN: 0941-4355
Publisher: Springer Verlag  
Date Published: 2011-08-01
Start Page: 1227
End Page: 1238
Language: English
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-010-0942-6
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 20593202
PMCID: PMC4834985
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Export Date: 3 October 2011" - "CODEN: SCCAE" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Jamie S Ostroff
    344 Ostroff
  2. Elyse Shuk
    62 Shuk