Safety of combining thoracic radiation therapy with concurrent versus sequential immune checkpoint inhibition Journal Article
| Authors: | von Reibnitz, D.; Chaft, J. E.; Wu, A. J.; Samstein, R.; Hellmann, M. D.; Plodkowski, A. J.; Zhang, Z.; Shi, W.; Dick-Godfrey, R.; Panchoo, K. H.; Barker, C. A.; Rimner, A. |
| Article Title: | Safety of combining thoracic radiation therapy with concurrent versus sequential immune checkpoint inhibition |
| Abstract: | Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate adverse events (AEs) in patients who received both immune checkpoint inhibitors and thoracic radiation therapy (RT). In particular, we compared the rate of toxicities of concurrent versus sequential delivery of thoracic RT and checkpoint inhibitors. Methods and Materials: Patient and treatment characteristics were collected on all patients at our institution who were treated with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and/or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors and underwent thoracic RT (n = 79). Receiving both treatments within 1 month was considered concurrent (n = 35; 44%), and any treatment up to 6 months apart was considered sequential (n = 44; 56%). The primary endpoint of this study was the rate of Grade ≥2 AEs from combination therapy (immunotherapy and RT), specifically those that are relevant to thoracic RT: Pneumonitis, other pulmonary events, esophagitis, dermatitis, and fatigue. Further univariate analysis was performed to compare AE rates with clinical and therapy-related variables. Results: A total of 79 patients were identified, with lung cancer (n = 45) and melanoma (n = 15) being the most common primary histology. Sixty-two (78%) patients were treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibodies, 12 (15%) with anti-CTLA-4 antibodies, and 5 (6%) received both anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. The median follow-up for survivors was 5.9 months (range, 2.4-55.6 months). Grade ≥2 AEs included pneumonitis (n = 5; 6%), esophagitis (n = 6; 8%), and dermatitis (n = 8; 10%). No statistically significant correlation was found between these AEs when comparing concurrent versus sequential treatment. The only significant variable was a correlation of immunotherapy drug category with Grade ≥2 esophagitis (P =.04). Conclusions: Overall, Grade ≥2 AE rates of thoracic RT and immunotherapy appeared as expected and acceptable. The lack of significant differences in AE rates with concurrent versus sequential treatment suggests that even concurrent immunotherapy and thoracic RT may be safe. © 2018 The Authors |
| Journal Title: | Advances in Radiation Oncology |
| Volume: | 3 |
| Issue: | 3 |
| ISSN: | 2452-1094 |
| Publisher: | Elsevier Inc. |
| Date Published: | 2018-07-01 |
| Start Page: | 391 |
| End Page: | 398 |
| Language: | English |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.adro.2018.05.001 |
| PROVIDER: | scopus |
| PMCID: | PMC6128092 |
| PUBMED: | 30202807 |
| DOI/URL: | |
| Notes: | Article -- Export Date: 1 August 2018 -- Source: Scopus |
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
-
429Zhang -
121Shi -
289Chaft -
218Barker -
527Rimner -
404Wu -
412Hellmann -
43Samstein -
114Plodkowski -
16von Reibnitz -
8
Panchoo -
11
Dick-Godfrey
Related MSK Work