Racial/ethnic differences in the epidemiology of ovarian cancer: A pooled analysis of 12 case-control studies Journal Article


Authors: Peres, L. C.; Risch, H.; Terry, K. L.; Webb, P. M.; Goodman, M. T.; Wu, A. H.; Alberg, A. J.; Bandera, E. V.; Barnholtz-Sloan, J.; Bondy, M. L.; Cote, M. L.; Funkhouser, E.; Moorman, P. G.; Peters, E. S.; Schwartz, A. G.; Terry, P. D.; Manichaikul, A.; Abbott, S. E.; Camacho, F.; Jordan, S. J.; Nagle, C. M.; Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group; Rossing, M. A.; Doherty, J. A.; Modugno, F.; Moysich, K.; Ness, R.; Berchuck, A.; Cook, L.; Le, N.; Brooks-Wilson, A.; Sieh, W.; Whittemore, A.; McGuire, V.; Rothstein, J.; Anton-Culver, H.; Ziogas, A.; Pearce, C. L.; Tseng, C.; Pike, M.; Schildkraut, J. M.; on behalf of the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study; Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium
Article Title: Racial/ethnic differences in the epidemiology of ovarian cancer: A pooled analysis of 12 case-control studies
Abstract: Background: Ovarian cancer incidence differs substantially by race/ethnicity, but the reasons for this are not well understood. Data were pooled from the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study (AACES) and 11 case-control studies in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC) to examine racial/ethnic differences in epidemiological characteristics with suspected involvement in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) aetiology. Methods: We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate associations for 17 reproductive, hormonal and lifestyle characteristics and EOC risk by race/ethnicity among 10 924 women with invasive EOC (8918 Non-Hispanic Whites, 433 Hispanics, 911 Blacks, 662 Asian/Pacific Islanders) and 16 150 controls (13 619 Non-Hispanic Whites, 533 Hispanics, 1233 Blacks, 765 Asian/Pacific Islanders). Likelihood ratio tests were used to evaluate heterogeneity in the risk factor associations by race/ethnicity. Results: We observed statistically significant racial/ethnic heterogeneity for hysterectomy and EOC risk (P = 0.008), where the largest odds ratio (OR) was observed in Black women [OR = 1.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.34-2.02] compared with other racial/ethnic groups. Although not statistically significant, the associations for parity, first-degree family history of ovarian or breast cancer, and endometriosis varied by race/ethnicity. Asian/Pacific Islanders had the greatest magnitude of association for parity (>= 3 births: OR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.28-0.54), and Black women had the largest ORs for family history (OR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.42-2.21) and endometriosis (OR = 2.42, 95% CI = 1.65-3.55). Conclusions: Although racial/ethnic heterogeneity was observed for hysterectomy, our findings support the validity of EOC risk factors across all racial/ethnic groups, and further suggest that any racial/ethnic population with a higher prevalence of a modifiable risk factor should be targeted to disseminate information about prevention.
Keywords: carcinoma; united-states; risk-factors; metaanalysis; heterogeneity; polymorphisms; subtypes; african-american women; cell-type; association consortium
Journal Title: International Journal of Epidemiology
Volume: 47
Issue: 2
ISSN: 0300-5771
Publisher: Oxford University Press  
Date Published: 2018-04-01
Start Page: 460
End Page: 472
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:000430706100022
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyx252
PROVIDER: wos
PMCID: PMC5913601
PUBMED: 29211900
Notes: Article -- Correction issued, see DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyx252 -- Source: Wos
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Malcolm Pike
    190 Pike