Influence of family on expected benefits of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in cancer patients Journal Article


Authors: Latte-Naor, S.; Sidlow, R.; Sun, L.; Li, Q. S.; Mao, J. J.
Article Title: Influence of family on expected benefits of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in cancer patients
Abstract: Background: Cancer patients often use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) based on recommendations from family. However, the relationship between family endorsement of CAM and the patient’s expectation of its benefits has never been quantified. Methods: Between 2010 and 2011, we conducted a cross-sectional survey study among patients with a diagnosis of cancer recruited from thoracic, breast, and gastrointestinal medical oncology clinics at a single academic cancer center. We performed multivariate linear regression analyses to evaluate the relationship between perceived family endorsement of and expected benefits from CAM, adjusting for covariates. Results: Among the 962 participants, 303 (31.3%) reported family endorsement of CAM use. Younger patients and those who had college or higher education were more likely to report family endorsement (both p < 0.05). Patients with family support had expectation scores that were 15.9 higher than patients without family support (coefficient 15.9, 95% CI 13.5, 18.2, p < 0.001). Participants with family encouragement of CAM use were also more likely to expect CAM to cure their cancer (12 vs. 37%) and prolong their life (24 vs. 61%). These relationships remained highly significant after adjusting for covariates). Conclusions: Family endorsement of CAM use is strongly associated with patient expectation of its clinical efficacy, including expectations for cure and improved survival. These findings underscore the importance of including family in counseling and education on CAM use in order to achieve realistic patient expectations, maximize benefits, and avoid potential medical adverse effects through herb-drug interactions or rejections of conventional care. © 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Keywords: adult; cancer surgery; major clinical study; cancer localization; cancer patient; cancer diagnosis; demography; age; social status; social support; expectation; cross-sectional study; sex difference; alternative medicine; age distribution; educational status; family; alternative; complementary; family attitude; cam; cancer; human; male; female; priority journal; article; family support
Journal Title: Supportive Care in Cancer
Volume: 26
Issue: 6
ISSN: 0941-4355
Publisher: Springer Verlag  
Date Published: 2018-06-01
Start Page: 2063
End Page: 2069
Language: English
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4053-0
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 29368030
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 June 2018 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric Score
MSK Authors
  1. Robert   Sidlow
    7 Sidlow
  2. Jun J Mao
    60 Mao
  3. Qing Susan Li
    15 Li
  4. Lingyun Sun
    4 Sun