Aggressive versus conventional strategies in the treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma Journal Article


Authors: Havenga, K.; Huang, Y.; Enker, W. E.; Welvaart, K.; de Roy van Zuidewijn, D. B. W.; Cohen, A. M.
Article Title: Aggressive versus conventional strategies in the treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma
Abstract: Objective: Comparison of an aggressive approach (including total mesorectal excision and combined modality adjuvant therapy) with a conventional approach in the treatment of primary rectal cancer. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre, New York (MSKCC) and University Hospital Leiden, the Netherlands (UHL). Subjects: One hundred and sixty-nine patients treated at MSKCC and 96 patients treated at UHL. Interventions: Total mesorectal excision (MSKCC) and conventional resection (UHL). Main outcome measures: Overall survival and local recurrence-free survival. Results: Five-year overall survival was 73% for MSKCC patients and 52% for UHL patients (P<0.001). Five-year local recurrence-free survival was 83% for MSKCC patients and 72% for UHL patients (P=0.001). Relative risk of dying or developing a local recurrence was 3.37 and 2.61, respectively, for patients treated at UHL compared to patients treated at MSKCC (P<0.001 and P=0.008, respectively). Conclusions: These data suggest that an aggressive approach including total mesorectal excision and combined modality adjuvant therapy improves survival and local control compared to a conventional approach.
Keywords: survival; lymphadenectomy; carcinoma; postoperative radiotherapy; total mesorectal excision; rectal adenocarcinoma; local recurrence; mesorectal excision; low anterior resection; pelvic recurrence; cancer; randomized multicenter
Journal Title: Surgical Oncology
Volume: 5
Issue: 4
ISSN: 0960-7404
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 1996-08-01
Start Page: 183
End Page: 188
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:A1996WL30200005
DOI: 10.1016/s0960-7404(96)80042-9
PROVIDER: wos
PUBMED: 9067567
Notes: Article -- Source: Wos
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Ying Huang
    22 Huang
  2. Alfred M Cohen
    244 Cohen
  3. Warren E. Enker
    70 Enker