Statewide inferior vena cava filter placement, complications, and retrievals: Epidemiology and recent trends Journal Article


Authors: Charalel, R. A.; Durack, J. C.; Mao, J.; Ross, J. S.; Meltzer, A. J.; Sedrakyan, A.
Article Title: Statewide inferior vena cava filter placement, complications, and retrievals: Epidemiology and recent trends
Abstract: Background: Public awareness of inferior vena cava (IVC) filter-related controversies has been elevated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) safety communication in 2010. Objectives: To examine population level trends in IVC filter utilization, complications, retrieval rates, and subsequent pulmonary embolism (PE) risk. Design: A retrospective cohort study. Subjects: Patients receiving IVC filters during 2005-2014 in New York State. Measures: IVC filter-specific complications, new PE occurrences and IVC filter retrievals were evaluated as time-to-event data using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Estimated cumulative risks were obtained at various timepoints during follow-up. Results: There were 91,873 patients receiving IVC filters between 2005 and 2014 in New York State included in the study. The average patient age was 67 years and 46.6% were male. Age-adjusted rates of IVC filter placement increased from 48 cases/100,000 in 2005 to 52 cases/100,000 in 2009, and decreased afterwards to 36 cases/100,000 in 2014. The estimated risks of having an IVC filter-related complication and filter retrieval within 1 year was 1.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.4%-1.6%] and 3.5% (95% CI, 3.4%-3.6%). One-year retrieval rate was higher post-2010 when compared with pre-2010 years (hazard ratio, 2.70; 95% CI, 2.50-2.91). Among the 58,176 patients who did not have PE events before or at the time of IVC filter placement, the estimated risk of developing subsequent PE at 1 year was 2.0% (95% CI, 1.9%-2.1%). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that FDA communications may be effective in modifying statewide clinical practices. Given the 2% observed PE rate following prophylactic IVC filter placement, large scale pragmatic studies are needed to determine contemporary safety and effectiveness of IVC filters. © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: aged; major clinical study; follow up; cohort analysis; deep vein thrombosis; retrospective study; device removal; lung embolism; pulmonary embolism; thrombosis; clinical effectiveness; new york; implantation; foreign body; device safety; medical device complication; human; male; female; priority journal; article; ivc filter
Journal Title: Medical Care
Volume: 56
Issue: 3
ISSN: 0025-7079
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 2018-03-01
Start Page: 260
End Page: 265
Language: English
DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000867
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 29356721
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 May 2018 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Jeremy Charles Durack
    116 Durack