Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in advanced renal-cell carcinoma Journal Article


Authors: Motzer, R. J.; Tannir, N. M.; McDermott, D. F.; Arén Frontera, O.; Melichar, B.; Choueiri, T. K.; Plimack, E. R.; Barthélémy, P.; Porta, C.; George, S.; Powles, T.; Donskov, F.; Neiman, V.; Kollmannsberger, C. K.; Salman, P.; Gurney, H.; Hawkins, R.; Ravaud, A.; Grimm, M. O.; Bracarda, S.; Barrios, C. H.; Tomita, Y.; Castellano, D.; Rini, B. I.; Chen, A. C.; Mekan, S.; McHenry, M. B.; Wind-Rotolo, M.; Doan, J.; Sharma, P.; Hammers, H. J.; Escudier, B.; for the CheckMate 214 Investigators
Article Title: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in advanced renal-cell carcinoma
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab produced objective responses in patients with advanced renal-cell carcinoma in a pilot study. This phase 3 trial compared nivolumab plus ipilimumab with sunitinib for previously untreated clear-cell advanced renal-cell carcinoma. METHODS: We randomly assigned adults in a 1:1 ratio to receive either nivolumab (3 mg per kilogram of body weight) plus ipilimumab (1 mg per kilogram) intravenously every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by nivolumab (3 mg per kilogram) every 2 weeks, or sunitinib (50 mg) orally once daily for 4 weeks (6-week cycle). The coprimary end points were overall survival (alpha level, 0.04), objective response rate (alpha level, 0.001), and progression-free survival (alpha level, 0.009) among patients with intermediate or poor prognostic risk. RESULTS: A total of 1096 patients were assigned to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab (550 patients) or sunitinib (546 patients); 425 and 422, respectively, had intermediate or poor risk. At a median follow-up of 25.2 months in intermediate- and poor-risk patients, the 18-month overall survival rate was 75% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70 to 78) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 60% (95% CI, 55 to 65) with sunitinib; the median overall survival was not reached with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus 26.0 months with sunitinib (hazard ratio for death, 0.63; P<0.001). The objective response rate was 42% versus 27% (P<0.001), and the complete response rate was 9% versus 1%. The median progression-free survival was 11.6 months and 8.4 months, respectively (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.82; P = 0.03, not significant per the prespecified 0.009 threshold). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 509 of 547 patients (93%) in the nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab group and 521 of 535 patients (97%) in the sunitinib group; grade 3 or 4 events occurred in 250 patients (46%) and 335 patients (63%), respectively. Treatment-related adverse events leading to discontinuation occurred in 22% and 12% of the patients in the respective groups. CONCLUSIONS: Overall survival and objective response rates were significantly higher with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with sunitinib among intermediate- and poor-risk patients with previously untreated advanced renal-cell carcinoma. Copyright © 2018 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Keywords: adult; controlled study; aged; aged, 80 and over; disease-free survival; middle aged; survival analysis; survival rate; clinical trial; mortality; sunitinib; comparative study; disease free survival; antineoplastic agent; ipilimumab; quality of life; randomized controlled trial; antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols; renal cell carcinoma; kidney neoplasms; risk; monoclonal antibody; antibodies, monoclonal; kidney tumor; carcinoma, renal cell; multicenter study; phase 3 clinical trial; indoles; pyrroles; indole derivative; pyrrole derivative; nivolumab; very elderly; humans; human; male; immunological antineoplastic agent; antineoplastic agents, immunological
Journal Title: New England Journal of Medicine
Volume: 378
Issue: 14
ISSN: 0028-4793
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society  
Date Published: 2018-04-05
Start Page: 1277
End Page: 1290
Language: English
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1712126
PUBMED: 29562145
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC5972549
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 May 2018 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Robert Motzer
    1243 Motzer