Identifying the optimal radiation dose in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy without concurrent chemotherapy Journal Article


Authors: Sonnick, M. A.; Oro, F.; Yan, B.; Desai, A.; Wu, A. J.; Shi, W.; Zhang, Z.; Gelblum, D. Y.; Paik, P. K.; Yorke, E. D.; Rosenzweig, K. E.; Chaft, J. E.; Rimner, A.
Article Title: Identifying the optimal radiation dose in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy without concurrent chemotherapy
Abstract: The optimal radiation dose for patients with inoperable, locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer ineligible for concurrent chemoradiation remains unclear. In the present retrospective, multivariate analysis of 336 patients treated with sequential chemoradiation or definitive radiation only, a radiation dose > 66 Gy was superior to a radiation dose < 60 Gy for the endpoints of overall survival and local failure. Introduction: The optimal radiation dose for locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not known for patients who receive sequential chemoradiation (CRT) or definitive radiotherapy (RT) only. Our objective was to determine whether a benefit exists for radiation dose escalation for these patients. Materials and Methods: The patients included in our retrospective analysis had undergone RT for NSCLC from 2004 to 2013, had not undergone surgery, and received a dose ≥ 50.0 Gy. Patients who received concurrent CRT were excluded from the analysis, leaving 336 patients for analysis. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), local failure (LF), and distant failure (DF). Results: On multivariate analysis, after adjusting for age, Karnofsky performance status, gross tumor volume, and treatment modality, patients treated with a radiation dose > 66 Gy had significantly improved OS compared with those treated with < 60 Gy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.87; P =.008). After adjusting for smoking history and radiologic tumor size, patients treated with a radiation dose > 66 Gy had a significantly decreased risk of LF compared with those treated with < 60 Gy (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.38-0.91; P =.02). The radiation dose was not an independent prognostic factor of DF on multivariate analysis. Conclusion: When controlling for tumor volume and/or dimensions and other independent prognostic factors, patients with locally advanced NSCLC who were not candidates for concurrent CRT benefited from a radiation dose > 66 Gy versus < 60 Gy with improved OS and reduced LF. An increased radiation dose did not appear to affect the incidence of DF. © 2017 Elsevier Inc.
Keywords: adult; cancer chemotherapy; aged; cancer surgery; primary tumor; major clinical study; overall survival; intensity modulated radiation therapy; advanced cancer; treatment planning; gemcitabine; paclitaxel; radiation dose; positron emission tomography; cancer grading; carboplatin; smoking; retrospective study; lung adenocarcinoma; karnofsky performance status; cancer size; platinum derivative; pemetrexed; lymphadenopathy; chemoradiotherapy; non small cell lung cancer; conformal radiotherapy; dose escalation; cancer prognosis; radiation dose escalation; local failure free survival; four dimensional computed tomography; human; male; female; article; squamous cell lung carcinoma; locally advanced non small cell lung cancer; definitive radiation; optimal radiation dose; distant failure free survival; inoperable tumor; rtog 0617; sequential chemoradiation
Journal Title: Clinical Lung Cancer
Volume: 19
Issue: 1
ISSN: 1525-7304
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2018-01-01
Start Page: e131
End Page: e140
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2017.06.019
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 28756051
PMCID: PMC7032523
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 2 April 2018 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Zhigang Zhang
    427 Zhang
  2. Weiji Shi
    121 Shi
  3. Daphna Y Gelblum
    227 Gelblum
  4. Jamie Erin Chaft
    289 Chaft
  5. Paul K Paik
    255 Paik
  6. Andreas Rimner
    524 Rimner
  7. Abraham Jing-Ching Wu
    400 Wu
  8. Ellen D Yorke
    450 Yorke
  9. Federica   Oro
    6 Oro
  10. Bernice Yan
    7 Yan
  11. Anish Desai
    1 Desai