Artificial differences in Clostridium difficile infection rates associated with disparity in testing Journal Article


Authors: Kamboj, M.; Brite, J.; Aslam, A.; Kennington, J.; Babady, N. E.; Calfee, D.; Furuya, Y.; Chen, D.; Augenbraun, M.; Ostrowsky, B.; Patel, G.; Mircescu, M.; Kak, V.; Tuma, R.; Karre, T. A.; Fry, D. A.; Duhaney, Y. P.; Moyer, A.; Mitchell, D.; Cantu, S.; Hsieh, C.; Warren, N.; Martin, S.; Willson, J.; Dickman, J.; Knight, J.; Delahanty, K.; Flood, A.; Harrington, J.; Korenstein, D.; Eagan, J.; Sepkowitz, K.
Article Title: Artificial differences in Clostridium difficile infection rates associated with disparity in testing
Abstract: In 2015, Clostridium difficile testing rates among 30 US community, multispecialty, and cancer hospitals were 14.0, 16.3, and 33.9/1,000 patient-days, respectively. Pooled hospital onset rates were 0.56, 0.84, and 1.57/1,000 patient-days, respectively. Higher testing rates may artificially inflate reported rates of C. difficile infection. C. difficile surveillance should consider testing frequency. © 2018, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). All rights reserved.
Keywords: diarrhea; nonhuman; prevalence; enzyme immunoassay; hospitalization; hospital admission; clostridium difficile infection; diagnostic test; disease transmission; nucleic acid amplification; article; peptoclostridium difficile
Journal Title: Emerging Infectious Diseases
Volume: 24
Issue: 3
ISSN: 1080-6040
Publisher: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention  
Date Published: 2018-03-01
Start Page: 584
End Page: 587
Language: English
DOI: 10.3201/eid2403.170961
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC5823336
PUBMED: 29460760
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 2 April 2018 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Ngolela Esther Babady
    171 Babady
  2. Kent A Sepkowitz
    272 Sepkowitz
  3. Mini Kamboj
    158 Kamboj
  4. Janet A Eagan
    39 Eagan
  5. Jennifer   Brite
    7 Brite
  6. Anoshe A Aslam
    18 Aslam