Prospective feasibility trial for genomics-informed treatment in recurrent and progressive glioblastoma Journal Article


Authors: Byron, S. A.; Tran, N. L.; Halperin, R. F.; Phillips, J. J.; Kuhn, J. G.; de Groot, J. F.; Colman, H.; Ligon, K. L.; Wen, P. Y.; Cloughesy, T. F.; Mellinghoff, I. K.; Butowski, N. A.; Taylor, J. W.; Clarke, J. L.; Chang, S. M.; Berger, M. S.; Molinaro, A. M.; Maggiora, G. M.; Peng, S.; Nasser, S.; Liang, W. S.; Trent, J. M.; Berens, M. E.; Carpten, J. D.; Craig, D. W.; Prados, M. D.
Article Title: Prospective feasibility trial for genomics-informed treatment in recurrent and progressive glioblastoma
Abstract: Purpose: Glioblastoma is an aggressive and molecularly heterogeneous cancer with few effective treatment options. We hypothesized that next-generationsequencing can be used to guide treatment recommendations within a clinically acceptable time frame following surgery for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Experimental Design: We conducted a prospective genomicsinformed feasibility trial in adults with recurrent and progressive glioblastoma. Following surgical resection, genome-wide tumor/normal exome sequencing and tumor RNA sequencing were performed to identify molecular targets for potential matched therapy. A multidisciplinary molecular tumor board issued treatment recommendations based on the genomic results, blood-brain barrier penetration of the indicated therapies, drug-drug interactions, and drug safety profiles. Feasibility of generating genomics-informed treatment recommendations within 35 days of surgery was assessed. Results: Of the 20 patients enrolled in the study, 16 patients had sufficient tumor tissue for analysis. Exome sequencing was completed for all patients, and RNA sequencing was completed for 14 patients. Treatment recommendations were provided within the study's feasibility time frame for 15 of 16 (94%) patients. Seven patients received treatment based on the tumor board recommendations. Two patients reached 12-month progression-free survival, both adhering to treatments based on the molecular profiling results. One patient remained on treatment and progression free 21 months after surgery, 3 times longer than the patient's previous time to progression. Analysis of matched nonenhancing tissue from 12 patients revealed overlapping as well as novel putatively actionable genomic alterations. Conclusions: Use of genome-wide molecular profiling is feasible and can be informative for guiding real-time, central nervous system-penetrant, genomics-informed treatment recommendations for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. © 2017 AACR.
Keywords: adult; clinical article; controlled study; human tissue; aged; cancer surgery; human cell; mutation; clinical trial; cancer recurrence; bevacizumab; erlotinib; drug safety; drug approval; adjuvant therapy; temozolomide; outcome assessment; prospective study; carboplatin; low drug dose; progression free survival; gene expression profiling; chlorpromazine; tumor biopsy; antineoplastic activity; cancer therapy; lomustine; feasibility study; glioblastoma; blood brain barrier; genomics; minocycline; metformin; everolimus; olaparib; rna sequence; molecularly targeted therapy; propranolol; next generation sequencing; trametinib; nivolumab; time to treatment; human; male; female; priority journal; article; whole genome sequencing; palbociclib; whole exome sequencing; genomics informed treatment recommendation; overlapping gene
Journal Title: Clinical Cancer Research
Volume: 24
Issue: 2
ISSN: 1078-0432
Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research  
Date Published: 2018-01-15
Start Page: 295
End Page: 305
Language: English
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-0963
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 29074604
PMCID: PMC7516926
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 February 2018 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors