Intraoperative implantation of a mesh of directional palladium sources (CivaSheet): Dosimetry verification, clinical commissioning, dose specification, and preliminary experience Journal Article


Authors: Cohen, G. N.; Episcopia, K.; Lim, S. B.; LoSasso, T. J.; Rivard, M. J.; Taggar, A. S.; Taunk, N. K.; Wu, A. J.; Damato, A. L.
Article Title: Intraoperative implantation of a mesh of directional palladium sources (CivaSheet): Dosimetry verification, clinical commissioning, dose specification, and preliminary experience
Abstract: Purpose To present the clinical commissioning of a novel 103Pd directional brachytherapy device (CivaSheet) for intraoperative radiation therapy. Methods and Materials Clinical commissioning for the CivaSheet consisted of establishing: (1) source strength calibration capabilities, (2) experimental verification of TG-43 dosimetry parameters, (3) treatment planning system validation, and (4) departmental practice for dose specification and source ordering. Experimental verification was performed in water with radiochromic film calibrated with a 37 kVp X-ray beam. Percentage difference ([measurements − calculation]/calculation) and distance to agreement (difference between film-to-source distance and distance that minimized the percentage difference) were calculated. Nomogram values (in U/100 Gy) for all configurations (up to 20 × 20 sources) were calculated for source ordering. Clinical commissioning was used on patients enrolled in an ongoing Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Results A source calibration procedure was established, and the treatment planning system was commissioned within standard clinical uncertainties. Percentage dose differences (distances to agreement) between measured and calculated doses were 8.6% (−0.12 mm), 0.6% (−0.01 mm), −6.4% (0.22 mm), and −10.0% (0.44 mm) at depths of 2.3, 5.1, 8.0, and 11.1 mm, respectively. All differences were within the experimental uncertainties. Nomogram values depended on sheet size and spatial extent. A value of 2.4U/100 Gy per CivaDot was found to satisfy most cases, ranging from 2.3 to 3.3U/100 Gy. Nomogram results depended on elongation of the treatment area with a higher variation observed for smaller treatment areas. Postimplantation dose evaluation was feasible. CONCLUSIONS Commissioning and clinical deployment of CivaSheet was feasible using BrachyVision for postoperative dose evaluation. Experimental verification confirmed that the available TG-43 dosimetry parameters are accurate for clinical use. © 2017 American Brachytherapy Society
Keywords: clinical article; clinical trial; treatment planning; radiation dose; dosimetry; radiation dose distribution; nomogram; radioisotope therapy; palladium 103; intraoperative radiotherapy; implantation; human; priority journal; article; civasheet; dose specification
Journal Title: Brachytherapy
Volume: 16
Issue: 6
ISSN: 1538-4721
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 2017-11-01
Start Page: 1257
End Page: 1264
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.07.010
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC5744045
PUBMED: 28827006
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 2 January 2018 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
MSK Authors
  1. Gilad N Cohen
    174 Cohen
  2. Seng Boh Lim
    70 Lim
  3. Abraham Jing-Ching Wu
    371 Wu
  4. Thomas J LoSasso
    98 LoSasso
  5. Neil Taunk
    31 Taunk
  6. Amandeep Singh Taggar
    15 Taggar
  7. Antonio Leonardo Damato
    63 Damato