Needlestick injuries in interventional radiology are common and underreported Journal Article


Authors: Deipolyi, A. R.; Prabhakar, A. M.; Naidu, S.; Oklu, R.
Article Title: Needlestick injuries in interventional radiology are common and underreported
Abstract: Purpose: To determine the prevalence of and risk factors for needlesticks in interventional radiology physicians, as well as the attitudes, behaviors, and conditions that promote or interfere with reporting of these injuries. Materials and Methods: A total of 3889 interventional radiologists from academic and private practice in the United States were surveyed by emailing all interventional radiologist members of the Society of Interventional Radiology, including attending-level physicians and trainees (April-August 2016). The institutional review board waived the need for consent. Questions inquired about the nature, frequency, and type of needlestick and sharps injuries and whether and to whom these incidents were reported. Stepwise regression was used to determine variables predicting whether injuries were reported. Results: In total, 908 (23%) interventional radiologists completed at least a portion of the survey. Eight hundred fourteen (91%) of 895 respondents reported a prior needlestick injury, 583 (35%) of 895 reported at least one injury while treating an HIV-positive patient, and 626 (71%) of 884 reported prior training regarding needlestick injury. There was, on average, one needlestick for every 5 years of practice. Most needlestick or sharps injuries were self inflicted (711 [87%] of 817) and involved a hollow-bore device (464 [56%] of 824). Only 566 (66%) of 850 injuries were reported. The most common reasons for not reporting included perceived lack of utility of reporting (79 [28%] of 282), perceived low risk for injury (56 [20%] of 282), noncontaminated needle (53 [19%] of 282), too-lengthy reporting process (37 [13%] of 282), and associated stigma (23 [8%] of 282). Only 156 (25%) of 624 respondents informed their significant other. Stepwise regression assessing variables affecting the likelihood of reporting showed that male sex (P = .009), low-risk patient (P <.0001), self injury (P = .010), trainee status (P < .0001), and the total number of prior injuries (P = .019) were independent predictors of not reporting. Conclusion: Needlestick injuries are ubiquitous among interventional radiologists and are often not reported. © 2017 RSNA.
Keywords: adult; middle aged; major clinical study; united states; human immunodeficiency virus infection; disease association; prevalence; risk factors; health survey; prediction; risk factor; interventional radiology; radiography, interventional; radiology, interventional; occupational health; stigma; risk management; automutilation; utilization; mandatory reporting; health surveys; low risk patient; needlestick injury; occupational accident; needlestick injuries; humans; human; male; female; priority journal; article; statistics and numerical data; occupational injuries; interventional radiologist
Journal Title: Radiology
Volume: 285
Issue: 3
ISSN: 0033-8419
Publisher: Radiological Society of North America, Inc.  
Date Published: 2017-12-01
Start Page: 870
End Page: 875
Language: English
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017170103
PUBMED: 28631962
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC5708289
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 2 January 2018 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors