Patterns of treatment failure and postrecurrence outcomes among patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma after chemoradiotherapy using modern radiation techniques Journal Article


Authors: Leeman, J. E.; Li, J. G.; Pei, X.; Venigalla, P.; Zumsteg, Z. S.; Katsoulakis, E.; Lupovitch, E.; McBride, S. M.; Tsai, C. J.; Boyle, J. O.; Roman, B. R.; Morris, L. G. T.; Dunn, L. A.; Sherman, E. J.; Lee, N. Y.; Riaz, N.
Article Title: Patterns of treatment failure and postrecurrence outcomes among patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma after chemoradiotherapy using modern radiation techniques
Abstract: IMPORTANCE Even though 15% to 50% of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) experience recurrence, relatively little is known regarding patterns of treatment failure and postrecurrence outcomes after chemoradiotherapy using modern radiation techniques (intensity-modulated radiotherapy [IMRT]). Recurrence patterns are significantly affected by variations in the quality of radiotherapy, which may confound findings from multicenter trials. OBJECTIVE To assess patterns of treatment failure and postrecurrence outcomes for patients with HNSCC treated with contemporary radiotherapy techniques. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This large single-institution cohort study reviewed the outcomes of 1000 consecutive patients with stage III to IVB oropharyngeal carcinoma (n = 703), laryngeal carcinoma (n = 126), or hypopharyngeal carcinoma (n = 46) treated with definitive IMRT with or without concurrent chemotherapy, as well as patients with oral cavity carcinoma (n = 125) treated with postoperative IMRT with or without concurrent systemic therapy, from December 1, 2001, to December 31, 2013, with a median follow-up of 65.1 months among surviving patients. Data analysis was performed from January 31, 2016, to February 17, 2017. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Patterns of treatment failure and overall survival following locoregional failure or distant metastasis. RESULTS Among the 1000 patients (186 women and 814 men; mean [SD] age, 59.3 [10.8] years), there were no marginal or isolated out-of-radiation-field failures. Among subsites, the cumulative incidence of local failure was highest among patients with oral cavity carcinoma vs those with oropharyngeal carcinoma (hazard ratio, 5.2; 95% CI, 3.1-8.6; P < .001). Furthermore, patients with oral cavity carcinoma experienced significantly shorter survival following distant metastasis (hazard ratio, 3.66; 95% CI, 1.98-6.80; P < .001). Patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma positive for human papillomavirus or p16 lived longer after locoregional failure compared with patents with oropharyngeal carcinoma negative for human papillomavirus or p16 (median survival, 36.5 vs 13.6 months; P = .007) but not after distant metastasis. Salvage surgery was associated with improved overall survival following locoregional failure (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.34-0.77; P = .001); oligometastatic disease (1 vs >= 2 lesions: hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.16-0.63; P = .001) was associated with improved overall survival following distant metastasis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Overall survival after recurrence of HNSCC is influenced by the HNSCC subsite and human papillomavirus or p16 status, as well surgical and systemic interventions. An oligometastatic phenotype characterizes patients with solitarymetastasis after chemoradiotherapy. These findings have important implications for clinical trial designs for HNSCC in the recurrent and oligometastatic setting.
Keywords: survival; imrt; intensity-modulated radiotherapy; resection; volume; surgical; lymph-nodes; quality; human-papillomavirus; pulmonary metastases; cancer
Journal Title: JAMA Oncology
Volume: 3
Issue: 11
ISSN: 2374-2437
Publisher: American Medical Association  
Date Published: 2017-11-01
Start Page: 1487
End Page: 1494
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:000414801500011
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0973
PROVIDER: wos
PMCID: PMC5710194
PUBMED: 28542679
Notes: Article -- Source: Wos
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Jay O Boyle
    148 Boyle
  2. Eric J Sherman
    339 Sherman
  3. Nadeem Riaz
    415 Riaz
  4. Nancy Y. Lee
    871 Lee
  5. Luc Morris
    278 Morris
  6. Xin Pei
    134 Pei
  7. Benjamin Raphael Roman
    75 Roman
  8. Sean Matthew McBride
    293 McBride
  9. Lara   Dunn
    141 Dunn
  10. Jonathan Eric Leeman
    77 Leeman
  11. Chiaojung Jillian   Tsai
    238 Tsai