Trends in reoperation after initial lumpectomy for breast cancer: Addressing overtreatment in surgical management Journal Article


Authors: Morrow, M.; Abrahamse, P.; Hofer, T. P.; Ward, K. C.; Hamilton, A. S.; Kurian, A. W.; Katz, S. J.; Jagsi, R.
Article Title: Trends in reoperation after initial lumpectomy for breast cancer: Addressing overtreatment in surgical management
Abstract: Importance: Surgery after initial lumpectomy to obtain more widely clear margins is common and may lead to mastectomy. Objective: To describe surgeons' approach to surgical margins for invasive breast cancer, and changes in postlumpectomy surgery rates, and final surgical treatment following a 2014 consensus statement endorsing a margin of "no ink on tumor." Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a population-based cohort survey study of 7303 eligible women ages 20 to 79 years with stage I and II breast cancer diagnosed in 2013 to 2015 and identified from the Georgia and Los Angeles County, California, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries. A total of 5080 (70%) returned a survey. Those with bilateral disease, missing stage or treatment data, and with ductal carcinoma in situ were excluded, leaving 3729 patients in the analytic sample; 98% of these identified their attending surgeon. Between April 2015 and May 2016, 488 surgeons were surveyed regarding lumpectomy margins; 342 (70%) responded completely. Pathology reports of all patients having a second surgery and a 30% sample of those with 1 surgery were reviewed. Time trends were analyzed with multinomial regression models. Main Outcomes and Measures: Rates of final surgical procedure (lumpectomy, unilateral mastectomy, bilateral mastectomy) and rates of additional surgery after initial lumpectomy over time, and surgeon attitudes toward an adequate lumpectomy margin. Results: The 67% rate of initial lumpectomy in the 3729 patient analytic sample was unchanged during the study. The rate of final lumpectomy increased by 13% from 2013 to 2015, accompanied by a decrease in unilateral and bilateral mastectomy (P = .002). Surgery after initial lumpectomy declined by 16% (P < .001). Pathology review documented no significant association between date of treatment and positive margins. Of 342 responding surgeons, 69% endorsed a margin of no ink on tumor to avoid reexcision in estrogen receptor-positive progesterone receptor-positive cancer and 63% for estrogen receptor-negative progesterone- receptor-negative cancer. Surgeons treating more than 50 breast cancers annually were significantly more likely to report this margin as adequate (85%; n = 105) compared with those treating 20 cases or fewer (55%; n = 131) (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Additional surgery after initial lumpectomy decreased markedly from 2013 to 2015 concomitant with dissemination of clinical guidelines endorsing a minimal negative margin. These findings suggest that surgeon-led initiatives to address potential overtreatment can reduce the burden of surgical management in patients with cancer.
Keywords: adult; treatment outcome; aged; middle aged; young adult; cancer grading; clinical practice; mastectomy; pathology; breast neoplasms; health service; partial mastectomy; surgeon; reoperation; cancer registry; seer program; mastectomy, segmental; trends; surgical margin; surgeons; neoplasm grading; humans; human; female; statistics and numerical data; practice patterns, physicians'; medical overuse; margins of excision
Journal Title: JAMA Oncology
Volume: 3
Issue: 10
ISSN: 2374-2437
Publisher: American Medical Association  
Date Published: 2017-10-01
Start Page: 1352
End Page: 1357
Language: English
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0774
PUBMED: 28586788
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC5710510
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 2 November 2017 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Monica Morrow
    772 Morrow