Interventions to improve follow-up of positive results on fecal blood tests: A systematic review Journal Article


Authors: Selby, K.; Baumgartner, C.; Levin, T. R.; Doubeni, C. A.; Zauber, A. G.; Schottinger, J.; Jensen, C. D.; Lee, J. K.; Corley, D. A.
Article Title: Interventions to improve follow-up of positive results on fecal blood tests: A systematic review
Abstract: Background: Fecal immunochemical testing is the most commonly used method for colorectal cancer screening worldwide. However, its effectiveness is frequently undermined by failure to obtain follow-up colonoscopy after positive test results. Purpose: To evaluate interventions to improve rates of followup colonoscopy for adults after a positive result on a fecal test (guaiac or immunochemical). Data Sources: English-language studies from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and Embase from database inception through June 2017. Study Selection: Randomized and nonrandomized studies reporting an intervention for colonoscopy follow-up of asymptomatic adults with positive fecal test results. Data Extraction: Two reviewers independently extracted data and ranked study quality; 2 rated overall strength of evidence for each category of study type. Data Synthesis: Twenty-three studies were eligible for analysis, including 7 randomized and 16 nonrandomized studies. Three were at low risk of bias. Eleven studies described patient-level interventions (changes to invitation, provision of results or followup appointments, and patient navigators), 5 provider-level interventions (reminders or performance data), and 7 system-level interventions (automated referral, precolonoscopy telephone calls, patient registries, and quality improvement efforts). Moderate evidence supported patient navigators and provider reminders or performance data. Evidence for system-level interventions was low. Seventeen studies reported the proportion of testpositive patients who completed colonoscopy compared with a control population, with absolute differences of -7.4 percentage points (95% CI,19 to 4.3 percentage points) to 25 percentage points (CI, 14 to 35 percentage points). Limitation: More than half of studies were at high or very high risk of bias; heterogeneous study designs and characteristics precluded meta-analysis. Conclusion: Patient navigators and giving providers reminders or performance data may help improve colonoscopy rates of asymptomatic adults with positive fecal blood test results. Current evidence about useful system-level interventions is scant and insufficient. Primary Funding Source: National Cancer Institute. (PROSPERO: CRD42016048286).
Keywords: colorectal neoplasms; patient care; colonoscopy; aftercare; bias (epidemiology); occult blood; utilization; patient navigation; humans; human; statistical bias
Journal Title: Annals of Internal Medicine
Volume: 167
Issue: 8
ISSN: 0003-4819
Publisher: American College of Physicians  
Date Published: 2017-10-17
Start Page: 565
End Page: 575
Language: English
DOI: 10.7326/m17-1361
PUBMED: 29049756
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC6178946
DOI/URL:
Notes: Review -- Export Date: 2 November 2017 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Ann G Zauber
    314 Zauber