Patient reactions to surgeon recommendations about contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for treatment of breast cancer Journal Article


Authors: Katz, S. J.; Janz, N. K.; Abrahamse, P.; Wallner, L. P.; Hawley, S. T.; An, L. C.; Ward, K. C.; Hamilton, A. S.; Morrow, M.; Jagsi, R.
Article Title: Patient reactions to surgeon recommendations about contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for treatment of breast cancer
Abstract: IMPORTANCE Guidelines assert that contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) should be discouraged in patients without an elevated risk for a second primary breast cancer. However, little is known about the impact of surgeons discouraging CPM on patient care satisfaction or decisions to seek treatment from another clinician. OBJECTIVE To examine the association between patient report of first-surgeon recommendation against CPM and the extent of discussion about it with 3 outcomes: Patient satisfaction with surgery decisions, receipt of a second opinion, and receipt of surgery by a second surgeon. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This population-based survey studywas conducted in Georgia and California.We identified 3880 women with stages 0 to II breast cancer treated in 2013-2014 through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries of Georgia and Los Angeles County. Surveys were sent approximately 2 months after surgery (71%response rate, n = 2578). In this analysis conducted from February toMay 2016, we included patients with unilateral breast cancer who considered CPM (n = 1140). Patients were selected between July 2013 and September 2014. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES We examined report of surgeon recommendations, level of discussion about CPM, satisfaction with surgical decision making, receipt of second surgical opinion, and surgery from a second surgeon. RESULTS The mean (SD) age of patients included in this study was 56 (10.6) years. About one-quarter of patients (26.7%; n = 304) reported that their first surgeon recommended against CPM and 30.1%(n = 343) reported no substantial discussion about CPM. Dissatisfaction with surgery decision was uncommon (7.6%; n = 130), controlling for clinical and demographic characteristics. One-fifth of patients (20.6%; n = 304) had a second opinion about surgical options and 9.8%(n = 158) had surgery performed by a second surgeon. Dissatisfaction was very low (3.9%; n = 42) among patients who reported that their surgeon did not recommend against CPM but discussed it. Dissatisfaction was substantively higher for those whose surgeon recommended against CPM with no substantive discussion (14.5%; n = 37).Women who received a recommendation against CPM were not more likely to seek a second opinion (17.1%among patients with recommendation against CPM vs 15.1% of others; P = .52) nor to receive surgery by a second surgeon (7.9%among patients with recommendation against CPM vs 8.3%of others; P = .88). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Most patients are satisfied with surgical decision making. First-surgeon recommendation against CPM does not appear to substantively increase patient dissatisfaction, use of second opinions, or loss of the patient to a second surgeon. © 2017 American Medical Association.
Keywords: adult; aged; middle aged; patient satisfaction; major clinical study; breast cancer; mastectomy; pathology; breast neoplasms; groups by age; patient participation; doctor patient relation; partial mastectomy; communication; referral and consultation; interpersonal communication; clinical decision making; neoplasms, second primary; patient attitude; patient referral; health care surveys; patient preference; prophylactic mastectomy; contralateral prophylactic mastectomy; health care survey; california; directive counseling; surgical oncology; georgia; humans; human; female; priority journal; article; statistics and numerical data
Journal Title: JAMA Surgery
Volume: 152
Issue: 7
ISSN: 2168-6254
Publisher: American Medical Association  
Date Published: 2017-07-01
Start Page: 658
End Page: 664
Language: English
DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0458
PUBMED: 28384687
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC5520628
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 2 October 2017 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Monica Morrow
    772 Morrow