Follow-up intervals in patients with Cushing’s disease: Recommendations from a panel of experienced pituitary clinicians Journal Article


Authors: Geer, E. B.; Ayala, A.; Bonert, V.; Carmichael, J. D.; Gordon, M. B.; Katznelson, L.; Manuylova, E.; Shafiq, I.; Surampudi, V.; Swerdloff, R. S.; Broder, M. S.; Cherepanov, D.; Eagan, M.; Lee, J.; Said, Q.; Neary, M. P.; Biller, B. M. K.
Article Title: Follow-up intervals in patients with Cushing’s disease: Recommendations from a panel of experienced pituitary clinicians
Abstract: Purpose: Follow-up guidelines are needed to assess quality of care and to ensure best long-term outcomes for patients with Cushing’s disease (CD). The purpose of this study was to assess agreement by experts on recommended follow-up intervals for CD patients at different phases in their treatment course. Methods: The RAND/UCLA modified Delphi process was used to assess expert consensus. Eleven clinicians who regularly manage CD patients rated 79 hypothetical patient scenarios before and after (“second round”) an in-person panel discussion to clarify definitions. Scenarios described CD patients at various time points after treatment. For each scenario, panelists recommended follow-up intervals in weeks. Panel consensus was assigned as follows: “agreement” if no more than two responses were outside a 2 week window around the median response; “disagreement” if more than two responses were outside a 2 week window around the median response. Recommendations were developed based on second round results. Results: Panel agreement was 65.9% before and 88.6% after the in-person discussion. The panel recommended follow-up within 8 weeks for patients in remission on glucocorticoid replacement and within 1 year of surgery; within 4 weeks for patients with uncontrolled persistent or recurrent disease; within 8–24 weeks in post-radiotherapy patients controlled on medical therapy; and within 24 weeks in asymptomatic patients with stable plasma ACTH concentrations after bilateral adrenalectomy. Conclusions: With a high level of consensus using the Delphi process, panelists recommended regular follow-up in most patient scenarios for this chronic condition. These recommendations may be useful for assessment of CD care both in research and clinical practice. © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
Keywords: treatment; follow-up; consensus statements; biochemical status; cushing’s disease; expert panel
Journal Title: Pituitary
Volume: 20
Issue: 4
ISSN: 1386-341X
Publisher: Springer  
Date Published: 2017-08-01
Start Page: 422
End Page: 429
Language: English
DOI: 10.1007/s11102-017-0801-2
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 28275992
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 August 2017 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Eliza Brevoort Geer
    49 Geer