Improving the evaluation and diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in 2017 Journal Article


Authors: Carlsson, S. V.; Roobol, M. J.
Article Title: Improving the evaluation and diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in 2017
Abstract: Purpose of review To provide an overview of the current state of the evidence and highlight recent advances in the evaluation and diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer, focusing on biomarkers, risk calculators and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). Recent findings In 2017 there are numerous options to improve early detection as compared to a purely prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based approach. All have strengths and drawbacks. In addition to repeating the PSA and performing clinical work-up (digital rectal examination and estimation of prostate volume), additional tests investigated in the initial biopsy setting are: %free PSA, Prostate Health Index, 4-kallikrein score, SelectMDx, and Michigan Prostate Score and in the repeat setting: %free PSA, Prostate Health Index, 4-kallikrein score, Prostate Cancer Antigen 3, and ConfirmMDx. Risk calculators are available for both biopsy settings and incorporate clinical data with, or without, biomarkers. mpMRI is an important diagnostic adjunct. Summary There are numerous tests available that can help increase the specificity of PSA, in the initial and repeat biopsy setting. All coincide with a small decrease in sensitivity of detecting high-grade cancer. Cost effectiveness is crucial. The way forward is a multivariable risk assessment on the basis of readily available clinical data, potentially with the addition of PSA subforms, preferably at low cost. MRI in the prediagnostic setting is promising, but is not ready for 'prime time'. © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: biomarkers; biopsy; prostate cancer; screening; risk stratification; early detection; mri; overdiagnosis
Journal Title: Current Opinion in Urology
Volume: 27
Issue: 3
ISSN: 0963-0643
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 2017-05-01
Start Page: 198
End Page: 204
Language: English
DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000382
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC5381721
PUBMED: 28221219
DOI/URL:
Notes: Review -- Export Date: 2 May 2017 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Sigrid Viktoria Carlsson
    220 Carlsson