Intrapancreatic distal common bile duct carcinoma: Analysis, staging considerations, and comparison with pancreatic ductal and ampullary adenocarcinomas Journal Article


Authors: Gonzalez, R. S.; Bagci, P.; Basturk, O.; Reid, M. D.; Balci, S.; Knight, J. H.; Kong, S. Y.; Memis, B.; Jang, K. T.; Ohike, N.; Tajiri, T.; Bandyopadhyay, S.; Krasinskas, A. M.; Kim, G. E.; Cheng, J. D.; Adsay, N. V.
Article Title: Intrapancreatic distal common bile duct carcinoma: Analysis, staging considerations, and comparison with pancreatic ductal and ampullary adenocarcinomas
Abstract: Distal common bile duct carcinoma is a poorly characterized entity for reasons such as variable terminology and difficulty in determining site of origin of intrapancreatic lesions. We compared clinicopathologic features of pancreatobiliary-type adenocarcinomas within the pancreas, but arising from the distal common bile duct, with those of pancreatic and ampullary origin. Upon careful review of 1017 pancreatoduodenectomy specimens with primary adenocarcinoma, 52 (5%) qualified as intrapancreatic distal common bile duct carcinoma. Five associated with an intraductal papillary neoplasm were excluded; the remaining 47 were compared to 109 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and 133 ampullary carcinomas. Distal common bile duct carcinoma patients had a younger median age (58 years) than pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients (65 years) and ampullary carcinoma patients (68 years). Distal common bile duct carcinoma was intermediate between pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and ampullary carcinoma with regard to tumor size and rates of node metastases and margin positivity. Median survival was better than for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (P=0.0010) but worse than for ampullary carcinoma (P=0.0006). Distal common bile duct carcinoma often formed an even band around the common bile duct and commonly showed intraglandular neutrophil-rich debris and a small tubular pattern. Poor prognostic indicators included node metastasis (P=0.0010), lymphovascular invasion (P=0.0299), and margin positivity (P=0.0069). Categorizing the tumors based on size also had prognostic relevance (P=0.0096), unlike categorization based on anatomic structures invaded. Primary distal common bile duct carcinoma is seen in younger patients than pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma or ampullary carcinoma. Its prognosis is significantly better than pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and worse than ampullary carcinoma, at least partly because of differences in clinical presentation. Use of size-based criteria for staging appears to improve its prognostic relevance. Invasive pancreatobiliary-type distal common bile duct carcinomas are uncommon in the West and have substantial clinicopathologic differences from carcinomas arising from the pancreas and ampulla.
Keywords: prognostic-factors; lymph-nodes; factors; soft-tissue; 5-year survivors; intraepithelial neoplasia; single institution; papillary mucinous neoplasm; t-classification; multivariate statistical-analysis; influencing survival
Journal Title: Modern Pathology
Volume: 29
Issue: 11
ISSN: 0893-3952
Publisher: Nature Research  
Date Published: 2016-11-01
Start Page: 1358
End Page: 1369
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:000386404800007
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.125
PROVIDER: wos
PUBMED: 27469329
PMCID: PMC5598556
Notes: Article -- Source: Wos
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Olca Basturk
    352 Basturk